Yesterday the Dalton crime syndicate submitted its proof in court. They submitted a pile of 80 pages, of which are facebook posts and hand written arguments to defend their cause – not only did they submit what they consider proof, but their entire playbook.
One thing we found out with this so called evidence that was submitted by the Dalton’s is how the dogs remained on the neighbors wooded lot. Mr Levasseur of MAPAQ had allowed Joe Dalton to tie his dogs on the wooded lot, did Mr Levassuer own that lot? We don’t know.
What we know is Joe Dalton had always claimed that he had permission to use the land, the landlord of the lot next door had told us that the owner in question was upset and wanted the dogs removed but had been told by MAPAQ that she had no choice but to endure the dogs during the MAPAQ investigation.
Under oath Ma Dalton claims that
Les chien n’avaient pas été abandonnés sur la propriété, mais “hébergés temporairement” sur la propriété du voisin avec l’accord du MAPAQ. M. Levasseur étant déjas dans le dossier pour tenter de replacer la meute d’alaskans qui étaient tous des chiens de refuge.
So here we have it folks, MAPAQ was helping the Dalton crime syndicate run from the law. The dogs were legally surrendered by the property owner, no agreement or warrant was ever needed. The landowner had every right to do as she pleased, even shooting the dogs.